SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Fiona M. Fidler · Study

Home/Author

Fiona M. Fidler

44 works· latest 2025· 4 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0002-2700-2562

h-index33

i1040

Citations8,221

Works here44

07

09

10

11

12

14

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Most cited in this library

Redefine statistical significance2017 · 2,771 citations
Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science2012 · 831 citations
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science2021 · 769 citations
Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts2009 · 351 citations
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution2018 · 346 citations

Works

44 shown

Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology

BMC Biology·2025·93 authors·Open access

57citations

Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims in COVID-19 preprints

Nature Human Behaviour·2024·54 authors·Open access

11citations

Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology

·2023·88 authors·preprint·Open access

41citations

Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups

Royal Society Open Science·2023·18 authors·Open access

12citations

Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods·2023·16 authors·review·Open access

12citations

Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process

BMC Research Notes·2022·9 authors·Open access

22citations

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science

Annual Review of Psychology·2021·16 authors·review·Open access

769citations

Mathematically aggregating experts’ predictions of possible futures

PLoS ONE·2021·16 authors·Open access

39citations

Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE)

·2021·63 authors·preprint·Open access

66citations

Predicting and reasoning about replicability using structured groups

·2021·16 authors·preprint·Open access

28citations

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence

Systematic Reviews·2021·16 authors·Open access

55citations

Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review

eLife·2020·4 authors·Open access

73citations

The role of replication studies in ecology

Ecology and Evolution·2020·3 authors·Open access

75citations

The role of replication studies in ecology

·2019·3 authors·preprint·Open access

11citations

Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers

PLoS ONE·2019·5 authors·Open access

100citations

Reproducibility of Scientific Results

·2018·1 author

199citations

Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution

PLoS ONE·2018·4 authors·Open access

346citations

Eliciting improved quantitative judgements using the IDEA protocol: A case study in natural resource management

PLoS ONE·2018·5 authors·Open access

129citations

Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency

Nature Ecology & Evolution·2018·10 authors·review·Open access

45citations

Anchoring effects on likelihood estimates

·2017·3 authors·preprint

0citations

Redefine statistical significance

Nature Human Behaviour·2017·69 authors·Open access

2,771citations

Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution

BioScience·2016·6 authors·Open access

95citations

Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions

Trends in Ecology & Evolution·2016·8 authors·review·Open access

201citations

I nvestigate D iscuss E stimate A ggregate for structured expert judgement

International Journal of Forecasting·2016·8 authors·Open access

132citations

Yes, but Don’t Underestimate Estimation

Psychological Science·2014·2 authors·Open access

5citations

Improving visual estimation through active feedback

Methods in Ecology and Evolution·2012·4 authors·Open access

54citations

Replicates and repeats—what is the difference and is it significant?

EMBO Reports·2012·3 authors·Open access

155citations

Evaluating the accuracy and calibration of expert predictions under uncertainty: predicting the outcomes of ecological research

Diversity and Distributions·2012·3 authors·Open access

71citations

Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science

Conservation Biology·2012·7 authors·review·Open access

831citations

The statistical recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta‐analysis

Australian Journal of Psychology·2011·4 authors·Open access

136citations

Subjective p Intervals

Methodology·2011·3 authors

24citations

Expert Status and Performance

PLoS ONE·2011·9 authors·Open access

315citations

Interpreting Significance: The Differences Between Statistical Significance, Effect Size, and Practical Importance

Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews·2010·1 author

56citations

Reducing Overconfidence in the Interval Judgments of Experts

Risk Analysis·2009·6 authors·Open access

351citations

Viewing Psychology as a Science of Estimation

PsycEXTRA Dataset·2009·2 authors·dataset

0citations

The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysis

Behaviour Research and Therapy·2007·3 authors

43citations

Statistical Reform in Psychology

Psychological Science·2007·8 authors·Open access

122citations

Scientific objectivity: Everyone's imaginary friend

PsycEXTRA Dataset·2007·3 authors·dataset

0citations

Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology

Conservation Biology·2006·5 authors

149citations

Toward Improved Statistical Reporting in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology·2005·8 authors

72citations

Statistical reform in medicine, psychology and ecology

The Journal of Socio-Economics·2004·4 authors

95citations

Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them Think

Psychological Science·2004·5 authors

244citations

The Fifth edition of the Apa Publication Manual: Why its Statistics Recommendations are so Controversial

Educational and Psychological Measurement·2002·1 author

102citations

Computing Correct Confidence Intervals for ANOVA Fixed- and Random-Effects Effect Sizes

Educational and Psychological Measurement·2001·1 author

107citations