SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Lisa Hartling · Study

Home/Author

Lisa Hartling

112 works· latest 2025· 1 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0001-8341-3991

h-index60

i10111

Citations55,137

Works here112

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

24

25

Most cited in this library

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation2018 · 43,318 citations
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement2022 · 849 citations
Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews2006 · 462 citations
Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People2015 · 448 citations
Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions2017 · 448 citations

Works

60 shown

Transparent Reporting of Pediatric Clinical Trial Interventions: TIDieR-Children and Adolescents

PEDIATRICS·2025·25 authors·Open access

10citations

Care Delivery Strategies for Anxiety, Depression, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Tourette Syndrome to Improve Health Outcomes in Children and Youth

Child Psychiatry & Human Development·2025·10 authors·review

4citations

Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol

JBI Evidence Synthesis·2025·42 authors·Open access

106citations

Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews

BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine·2024·8 authors·Open access

81citations

Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement

BMJ·2022·20 authors·Open access

849citations

Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement

·2022·19 authors·preprint·Open access

16citations

Creating efficiencies in the extraction of data from randomized trials: a prospective evaluation of a machine learning and text mining tool

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2021·6 authors·Open access

24citations

A systematic review of factors that influence the acceptability of vaccines among Canadians

Vaccine·2020·11 authors·review·Open access

36citations

Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews

Systematic Reviews·2020·8 authors·Open access

31citations

Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review

Systematic Reviews·2020·5 authors·review·Open access

115citations

The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr’s relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2020·6 authors·Open access

80citations

Quality and risk of bias appraisals of systematic reviews are inconsistent across reviewers and centers

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2020·10 authors·review·Open access

73citations

Considerations for Health Researchers Using Social Media for Knowledge Translation: Multiple Case Study

Journal of Medical Internet Research·2020·10 authors·Open access

27citations

Examining the Usage, User Experience, and Perceived Impact of an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Adolescents With Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Mental Health·2019·5 authors·Open access

30citations

Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

Systematic Reviews·2019·7 authors·Open access

228citations

Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools

Systematic Reviews·2019·7 authors·review·Open access

133citations

Potential Reduction of Symptoms With the Use of Persuasive Systems Design Features in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Programs for Children and Adolescents With Anxiety: A Realist Synthesis

JMIR Mental Health·2019·8 authors·review·Open access

12citations

Equity and specific populations

·2019·14 authors·other

23citations

Design and Delivery Features That May Improve the Use of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Anxiety: A Realist Literature Synthesis With a Persuasive Systems Design Perspective

Journal of Medical Internet Research·2019·8 authors·review·Open access

40citations

A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

Systematic Reviews·2019·5 authors·review·Open access

131citations

The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

Systematic Reviews·2019·5 authors·Open access

52citations

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

Annals of Internal Medicine·2018·28 authors·Open access

43,318citations

What are the features of targeted or system-wide initiatives that affect diversity in health professions trainees? A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 50

Medical Teacher·2018·6 authors·review

34citations

Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study

Systematic Reviews·2018·10 authors·review·Open access

60citations

Dissemination of evidence in paediatric emergency medicine: a quantitative descriptive evaluation of a 16-week social media promotion

BMJ Open·2018·5 authors·Open access

23citations

eMental Healthcare Technologies for Anxiety and Depression in Childhood and Adolescence: Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Implementation Outcomes

JMIR Mental Health·2018·9 authors·review·Open access

50citations

Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool

Systematic Reviews·2018·2 authors·review·Open access

148citations

Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·3 authors·review

54citations

Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·9 authors·review

221citations

Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions

Europe PMC (PubMed Central)·2017·9 authors

61citations

Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·15 authors·review·Open access

122citations

The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years

The Journal of Pediatrics·2017·10 authors·review·Open access

41citations

Social Media for the Dissemination of Cochrane Child Health Evidence: Evaluation Study

Journal of Medical Internet Research·2017·8 authors·Open access

43citations

How do eHealth Programs for Adolescents With Depression Work? A Realist Review of Persuasive System Design Components in Internet-Based Psychological Therapies

Journal of Medical Internet Research·2017·8 authors·review·Open access

93citations

Pediatric eMental healthcare technologies: a systematic review of implementation foci in research studies, and government and organizational documents

Implementation Science·2017·9 authors·review·Open access

26citations

Implementation of eMental Health care: viewpoints from key informants from organizations and agencies with eHealth mandates

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making·2017·8 authors·Open access

58citations

Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2017·6 authors·review·Open access

325citations

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012–2016: protocol for a systematic review

Systematic Reviews·2017·5 authors·review·Open access

25citations

Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2017·3 authors·review·Open access

107citations

Outcomes in Child Health: Exploring the Use of Social Media to Engage Parents in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Journal of Medical Internet Research·2017·5 authors·Open access

23citations

Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?

BMC Pediatrics·2017·8 authors·review·Open access

20citations

Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews

Systematic Reviews·2017·17 authors·Open access

65citations

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions

·2017·9 authors·review·Open access

448citations

Understanding Health Systems' Use of and Need for Evidence To Inform Decisionmaking

·2017·16 authors·report·Open access

18citations

What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary

Systematic Reviews·2016·5 authors·review·Open access

195citations

The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2016·6 authors·review·Open access

118citations

Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2016·7 authors·review

36citations

EPC Methods: AHRQ End-User Perspectives of Rapid Reviews

Europe PMC (PubMed Central)·2016·17 authors

13citations

A Systematic Review of Social Media Use to Discuss and View Deliberate Self-Harm Acts

PLoS ONE·2016·8 authors·review·Open access

187citations

To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A combined meta-analysis of N-of-1 trial data with RCT data on amphetamines and methylphenidate for pediatric ADHD

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2016·6 authors·review

23citations

PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research

BMJ Open·2016·8 authors·review·Open access

33citations

An evaluation of harvest plots to display results of meta-analyses in overviews of reviews: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2015·6 authors·Open access

13citations

Preferences of Knowledge Users for Two Formats of Summarizing Results from Systematic Reviews: Infographics and Critical Appraisals

PLoS ONE·2015·2 authors·review·Open access

62citations

A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2015·16 authors·Open access

76citations

Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2015·14 authors·review

65citations

Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine·2015·9 authors

448citations

Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews

Systematic Reviews·2015·9 authors·Open access

140citations

EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews

·2015·18 authors

62citations

Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2014·18 authors

279citations

A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials

Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal·2014·5 authors

46citations