SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Jørn Wetterslev · Study

Home/Author

Jørn Wetterslev

27 works· latest 2021· 5 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0001-7778-1771

h-index23

i1027

Citations9,634

Works here27

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

21

Most cited in this library

Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis2007 · 1,879 citations
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis2017 · 1,196 citations
Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses2008 · 1,117 citations
Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses2009 · 940 citations
Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses2008 · 917 citations

Works

27 shown

A new tool to assess Clinical Diversity In Meta‐analyses (CDIM) of interventions

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2021·45 authors·Open access

44citations

DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2019·5 authors·Open access

47citations

Apparently conclusive meta-analyses on interventions in critical care may be inconclusive—a meta-epidemiological study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2019·10 authors·review·Open access

10citations

Systematic overview and critical appraisal of meta‐analyses of interventions in intensive care medicine

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2018·5 authors·review

19citations

Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2017·3 authors·review·Open access

1,196citations

Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?

Anaesthesia·2016·3 authors·review·Open access

56citations

False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review

BMJ Open·2016·4 authors·Open access

278citations

Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them

European Journal of Internal Medicine·2016·18 authors·review·Open access

109citations

Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews·2016·4 authors·other·Open access

67citations

Systematic Reviews of Anesthesiologic Interventions Reported as Statistically Significant

Anesthesia & Analgesia·2015·4 authors·review

102citations

When may systematic reviews and meta-analyses be considered reliable?

European Journal of Anaesthesiology·2015·2 authors·review

44citations

Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2014·5 authors·review·Open access

704citations

Trial sequential analysis has the potential to improve the reliability of conclusions in meta-analysis

Contemporary Clinical Trials·2013·3 authors·other

12citations

Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: How common are false positive and false negative results?

International Journal of Cardiology·2012·5 authors

36citations

Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses

PLoS ONE·2012·9 authors·Open access

429citations

Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews

PLoS ONE·2011·5 authors·review·Open access

43citations

Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian–Laird and alternative random‐effects model meta‐analyses – an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta‐analyses

Research Synthesis Methods·2011·5 authors

83citations

The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study

PLoS ONE·2011·9 authors·Open access

320citations

Comments on ‘Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool’ by I van der Tweel and C Bollen

Clinical Trials·2010·5 authors·other

11citations

Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2010·4 authors·Open access

219citations

Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2009·5 authors

24citations

Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2009·4 authors·Open access

940citations

Robustness Assessments Are Needed to Reduce Bias in Meta-Analyses That Include Zero-Event Randomized Trials

The American Journal of Gastroenterology·2009·5 authors

94citations

Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses

International Journal of Epidemiology·2008·4 authors

917citations

Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?

International Journal of Epidemiology·2008·9 authors

834citations

Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2008·4 authors

1,117citations

Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2007·4 authors

1,879citations