SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

L.M. Bouter · Study

Home/Author

L.M. Bouter

116 works· latest 2026· 10 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0002-2659-5482

h-index58

i10113

Citations57,268

Works here116

09

10

11

12

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Most cited in this library

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires2006 · 10,756 citations
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes2010 · 4,460 citations
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews2007 · 4,376 citations
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study2010 · 4,259 citations
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures2018 · 3,333 citations

Works

60 shown

Self-Disclosed Use of AI in Research Submissions to BMJ Journals

JAMA·2026·5 authors·Open access

11citations

Attitudes and perceptions of biomedical journal editors in chief towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scholarly publishing process: a cross-sectional survey

Research Integrity and Peer Review·2025·15 authors·Open access

13citations

The attribution of two portraits of Rembrandt revisited: a replication study in art history

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications·2025·5 authors·Open access

1citations

Are open science practices in dentistry associated with higher Altmetric scores and citation rates?

Journal of Dentistry·2024·9 authors·Open access

8citations

Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2024·7 authors·Open access

32citations

Systematic review search strategies are poorly reported and not reproducible: a cross-sectional metaresearch study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2023·8 authors·review·Open access

49citations

Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action

PLoS Biology·2023·3 authors·Open access

18citations

The core epistemic responsibilities of universities: Results from a Delphi study

Accountability in Research·2023·6 authors·Open access

8citations

Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

Science and Engineering Ethics·2023·10 authors·Open access

19citations

What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?

Science and Engineering Ethics·2023·4 authors·Open access

19citations

Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved

Accountability in Research·2023·1 author·editorial·Open access

47citations

Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines

PLoS ONE·2023·4 authors·Open access

32citations

Research misconduct and questionable research practices form a continuum

Accountability in Research·2023·1 author·Open access

24citations

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

·2023·1 author·review

168citations

Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments

Collaborative bioethics·2023·2 authors·review·Open access

13citations

Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development – how, what, why and when?

Accountability in Research·2022·10 authors·Open access

23citations

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2022·10 authors·Open access

18citations

Research funders should be more transparent: a plea for open applications

Royal Society Open Science·2022·3 authors·Open access

11citations

Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined

BMC Research Notes·2022·5 authors·Open access

65citations

Clinical Trial Registration Patterns and Changes in Primary Outcomes of Randomized Clinical Trials From 2002 to 2017

JAMA Internal Medicine·2022·7 authors·Open access

12citations

Prevalence of responsible research practices among academics in The Netherlands

F1000Research·2022·7 authors·Open access

33citations

Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands

PLoS ONE·2022·6 authors·Open access

292citations

Partial lottery can make grant allocation more fair, more efficient, and more diverse

Science and Public Policy·2022·3 authors·Open access

13citations

Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials·2021·7 authors·review·Open access

12citations

Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study

Science and Public Policy·2021·13 authors·Open access

39citations

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017

Nature Communications·2021·5 authors·review·Open access

53citations

Replication and trustworthiness

Accountability in Research·2021·2 authors·Open access

39citations

Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments

·2021·2 authors·preprint·Open access

17citations

Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study

Science and Engineering Ethics·2021·8 authors·Open access

36citations

Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Research Integrity and Peer Review·2021·5 authors·Open access

27citations

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement

PLoS Biology·2021·10 authors·Open access

103citations

Citation bias and other determinants of citation in biomedical research: findings from six citation networks

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2020·5 authors·Open access

97citations

COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study

BMC Medical Research Methodology·2020·8 authors·Open access

587citations

Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations

JAMA·2020·7 authors·Open access

78citations

Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk

Nature·2020·21 authors·Open access

167citations

Replication Research Series-Paper 2 : Empirical research must be replicated before its findings can be trusted

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2020·2 authors·Open access

17citations

Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study

Science and Engineering Ethics·2020·5 authors·Open access

51citations

The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity

PLoS Biology·2020·9 authors·Open access

545citations

Standardized Protocol Items Recommendations for Observational Studies (SPIROS) for Observational Study Protocol Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Delphi Study

JMIR Research Protocols·2020·8 authors·Open access

36citations

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity

Science and Engineering Ethics·2020·1 author·Open access

88citations

Should research misconduct be criminalized?

Research Ethics·2020·5 authors·Open access

79citations

Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam

Research Integrity and Peer Review·2019·6 authors·Open access

37citations

Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines

PLoS ONE·2019·4 authors·Open access

51citations

Value pluralism in research integrity

Research Integrity and Peer Review·2019·4 authors·Open access

46citations

The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias

Systematic Reviews·2019·5 authors·review·Open access

40citations

Causes of reporting bias: a theoretical framework

F1000Research·2019·4 authors·Open access

36citations

Selective citation in the literature on the hygiene hypothesis: a citation analysis on the association between infections and rhinitis

BMJ Open·2019·5 authors·Open access

11citations

Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

PLoS ONE·2019·4 authors·Open access

83citations

The possibility and desirability of replication in the humanities

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications·2018·2 authors·Open access

73citations

Humanities need a replication drive too

Nature·2018·2 authors·Open access

26citations

COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study

Quality of Life Research·2018·9 authors·Open access

2,328citations

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

Quality of Life Research·2018·7 authors·review·Open access

3,333citations

Responsible Epidemiologic Research Practice: a guideline developed by a working group of the Netherlands Epidemiological Society

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2018·7 authors·Open access

22citations

Determinants of selective reporting: A taxonomy based on content analysis of a random selection of the literature

PLoS ONE·2018·7 authors·Open access

26citations

Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·1 author·Open access

49citations

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Quality of Life Research·2017·7 authors·review·Open access

2,473citations

Scientific citations favor positive results: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·5 authors·review·Open access

197citations

Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse Are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection

Accountability in Research·2017·2 authors·editorial·Open access

41citations

Rating of Included Trials on the Efficacy–Effectiveness Spectrum: development of a new tool for systematic reviews

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology·2017·14 authors·review·Open access

59citations

Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity

Research Integrity and Peer Review·2016·5 authors·Open access

211citations