SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Mark Pearson · Study

Home/Author

Mark Pearson

14 works· latest 2024· 2 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0001-7628-7421

h-index12

i1013

Citations496

Works here14

09

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

24

Most cited in this library

Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?2016 · 77 citations
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review2016 · 65 citations
The role of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in evaluating interventions: a case study2012 · 61 citations
Building programme theory to develop more adaptable and scalable complex interventions: Realist formative process evaluation prior to full trial2018 · 56 citations
What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews2015 · 47 citations

Works

14 shown

Developing a strategy to scale up place-based arts initiatives that support mental health and wellbeing: A realist evaluation of ‘Arts for the Blues’

PLoS ONE·2024·6 authors·Open access

5citations

Building and diversifying our interdisciplinary giants: moving scholarship on evidence and policy forward

Evidence & Policy·2019·10 authors·Open access

10citations

Building programme theory to develop more adaptable and scalable complex interventions: Realist formative process evaluation prior to full trial

Evaluation·2018·12 authors·Open access

56citations

A realist review and collaborative development of what works in the social prescribing process

The Lancet·2017·10 authors

15citations

Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?

Trials·2016·7 authors·Open access

77citations

What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review

Systematic Reviews·2016·10 authors·Open access

65citations

What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews

PLoS ONE·2015·2 authors·Open access

47citations

Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On

American Journal of Public Health·2014·3 authors·Open access

30citations

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of shared care: protocol for a realist review

Systematic Reviews·2013·4 authors·Open access

33citations

The role of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in evaluating interventions: a case study

Research Synthesis Methods·2012·5 authors·review·Open access

61citations

Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines

BMJ Open·2012·3 authors·Open access

33citations

Outcome reporting bias in evaluations of public health interventions: evidence of impact and the potential role of a study register

Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health·2011·1 author·Open access

12citations

Effectiveness of Search Strategies for Qualitative Research About Barriers and Facilitators of Program Delivery

Evaluation & the Health Professions·2011·3 authors·Open access

34citations

The challenge of external validity in policy‐relevant systematic reviews: a case study from the field of substance misuse

Addiction·2009·2 authors·review·Open access

18citations