S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Dashboard
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Daniele Fanelli · Study
Home
/
Author
Daniele Fanelli
32 works
· latest 2024
· 6 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0003-1780-1958
Works
32 shown
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2024
·
12 authors
·
Open access
63
citations
Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
·
2023
·
6 authors
·
Open access
28
citations
Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications
PLoS ONE
·
2022
·
5 authors
·
Open access
22
citations
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses
Accountability in Research
·
2021
·
2 authors
·
Open access
49
citations
Pressures to Publish: What Effects Do We See?
The MIT Press eBooks
·
2020
·
1 author
·
chapter
·
Open access
21
citations
Lost Evidence From Registered Large Long-Unpublished Randomized Controlled Trials: A Survey
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2019
·
6 authors
17
citations
A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge
Royal Society Open Science
·
2019
·
1 author
·
Open access
31
citations
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
·
2018
·
1 author
·
Open access
416
citations
Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications
Science and Engineering Ethics
·
2018
·
5 authors
·
Open access
65
citations
Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
·
2018
·
3 authors
65
citations
Meta-assessment of bias in science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
·
2017
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
364
citations
Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error
Science and Engineering Ethics
·
2017
·
4 authors
·
Open access
52
citations
What does research reproducibility mean?
Science Translational Medicine
·
2016
·
3 authors
·
review
1,291
citations
Set up a ‘self-retraction’ system for honest errors
Nature
·
2016
·
1 author
·
Open access
51
citations
Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century
PLoS ONE
·
2016
·
2 authors
·
Open access
204
citations
Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias
PLoS ONE
·
2016
·
3 authors
·
Open access
45
citations
Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
PLoS Biology
·
2015
·
4 authors
·
Open access
492
citations
Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
PLoS ONE
·
2015
·
3 authors
·
Open access
267
citations
We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions
Addiction
·
2014
·
1 author
·
Open access
9
citations
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
Science and Engineering Ethics
·
2014
·
2 authors
·
review
128
citations
Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
PLoS Medicine
·
2013
·
1 author
·
Open access
272
citations
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
·
2013
·
2 authors
·
Open access
131
citations
Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences
PLoS ONE
·
2013
·
2 authors
·
Open access
198
citations
Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting
Nature
·
2013
·
1 author
99
citations
Any publicity is better than none: newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy
Scientometrics
·
2012
·
1 author
30
citations
Positive results receive more citations, but only in some disciplines
Scientometrics
·
2012
·
1 author
67
citations
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Scientometrics
·
2011
·
1 author
1,215
citations
The black, the white and the grey areas - towards an international and interdisciplinary definition of scientific misconduct.
·
2011
·
1 author
22
citations
Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
PLoS ONE
·
2010
·
1 author
·
Open access
804
citations
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
PLoS ONE
·
2010
·
1 author
·
Open access
733
citations
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
PLoS ONE
·
2009
·
1 author
·
review
·
Open access
1,909
citations
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
PsycEXTRA Dataset
·
2009
·
1 author
·
review
38
citations