S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Penny F. Whiting · Study
Home
/
Author
Penny F. Whiting
52 works
· latest 2025
· 7 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0003-1138-5682
Works
52 shown
The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence
Nature Medicine
·
2025
·
43 authors
·
Open access
389
citations
Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using AI (QUADAS-AI): Protocol for a Qualitative Study
JMIR Research Protocols
·
2024
·
6 authors
·
Open access
72
citations
Assessing risk of bias and applicability
·
2023
·
7 authors
·
other
·
Open access
47
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
439
citations
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement
BMJ
·
2022
·
20 authors
·
Open access
849
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
130
citations
QUAPAS: An Adaptation of the QUADAS-2 Tool to Assess Prognostic Accuracy Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2022
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
92
citations
Pravila PRISMA 2020.
Medicina Fluminensis
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
166
citations
QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2021
·
8 authors
·
Open access
326
citations
A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI
Nature Medicine
·
2021
·
38 authors
·
Open access
265
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
1,309
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
2,089
citations
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
BMJ Open
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
331
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
107,380
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
13,845
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,660
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
PLoS Medicine
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
5,137
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
International Journal of Surgery
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,672
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
4,227
citations
Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
BMJ
·
2021
·
22 authors
·
review
·
Open access
87
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
8,068
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
5,174
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
916
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
167
citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
BMJ
·
2020
·
21 authors
·
review
·
Open access
716
citations
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
BMJ
·
2019
·
28 authors
·
Open access
33,067
citations
Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis
Journal of Medical Internet Research
·
2019
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
168
citations
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2018
·
9 authors
·
Open access
2,953
citations
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2018
·
9 authors
·
Open access
1,663
citations
ROBIS: un nuovo strumento sviluppato per valutare i rischi di distorsione nelle revisioni sistematiche
Recenti Progressi in Medicina
·
2018
·
9 authors
·
Open access
158
citations
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
JAMA
·
2018
·
25 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,196
citations
A proposed framework for developing quality assessment tools
Systematic Reviews
·
2017
·
5 authors
·
Open access
120
citations
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
BMJ
·
2016
·
35 authors
·
Open access
20,225
citations
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2015
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
2,266
citations
Systematic review of intervention design and delivery in pragmatic and explanatory surgical randomized clinical trials
British journal of surgery
·
2015
·
6 authors
·
review
51
citations
Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2014
·
5 authors
·
review
69
citations
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2013
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
145
citations
A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2013
·
4 authors
·
review
·
Open access
283
citations
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2011
·
9 authors
·
Open access
14,163
citations
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2010
·
6 authors
116
citations
Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression
The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
·
2009
·
2 authors
·
review
·
Open access
452
citations
An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2008
·
7 authors
·
review
217
citations
Graphical presentation of diagnostic information
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2008
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
61
citations
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2007
·
5 authors
·
review
112
citations
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
Biostatistics
·
2006
·
5 authors
·
review
752
citations
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2006
·
6 authors
·
Open access
769
citations
How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2005
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
87
citations
No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2005
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
337
citations
A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2005
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
79
citations
Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies
Health Technology Assessment
·
2004
·
6 authors
·
Open access
372
citations
Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2004
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
800
citations
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2003
·
5 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,593
citations