SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rachel Heyard · Study

Home/Author

Rachel Heyard

8 works· latest 2025· 2 institutionscluster: provisionalORCID 0000-0002-7531-4333

h-index8

i106

Citations242

Works here8

20

21

22

23

24

25

Most cited in this library

The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants2021 · 106 citations
Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports2020 · 52 citations
Rethinking the Funding Line at the Swiss National Science Foundation: Bayesian Ranking and Lottery2022 · 30 citations
A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics2025 · 13 citations
Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?2024 · 13 citations

Works

8 shown

A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics

Royal Society Open Science·2025·11 authors·review·Open access

13citations

Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?

eLife·2024·4 authors·Open access

13citations

Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?

eLife·2023·4 authors·Open access

9citations

Replication Success Under Questionable Research Practices—a Simulation Study

Statistical Science·2023·3 authors·Open access

9citations

Rethinking the Funding Line at the Swiss National Science Foundation: Bayesian Ranking and Lottery

Statistics and Public Policy·2022·4 authors·Open access

30citations

The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications·2021·2 authors·Open access

106citations

Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation

BMJ Open·2021·4 authors·Open access

10citations

Gender and other potential biases in peer review: cross-sectional analysis of 38 250 external peer review reports

BMJ Open·2020·6 authors·Open access

52citations