S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Matthew James Page · Study
Home
/
Author
Matthew James Page
67 works
· latest 2025
· 4 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0002-4242-7526
Works
60 shown
Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol
JBI Evidence Synthesis
·
2025
·
42 authors
·
Open access
106
citations
Extension of the PRISMA 2020 statement for living systematic reviews (PRISMA-LSR): checklist and explanation
BMJ
·
2024
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
75
citations
Biomedical researchers’ perspectives on the reproducibility of research
PLoS Biology
·
2024
·
7 authors
·
Open access
58
citations
ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
BMJ
·
2023
·
19 authors
·
review
·
Open access
134
citations
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2023
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
191
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
439
citations
Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
BMJ
·
2022
·
15 authors
·
review
·
Open access
68
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
130
citations
Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers
BMJ
·
2022
·
10 authors
·
review
86
citations
PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
Campbell Systematic Reviews
·
2022
·
4 authors
·
Open access
3,462
citations
Pravila PRISMA 2020.
Medicina Fluminensis
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
166
citations
PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
·
2021
·
2 authors
·
Open access
197
citations
ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis
BMC Medicine
·
2021
·
10 authors
·
Open access
129
citations
Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2021
·
3 authors
271
citations
Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance
British Journal of Sports Medicine
·
2021
·
22 authors
·
review
·
Open access
457
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
1,309
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
2,089
citations
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews
Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
·
2021
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
418
citations
Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation
BMJ Open
·
2021
·
11 authors
·
Open access
50
citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
·
2021
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
708
citations
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews
PLoS Biology
·
2021
·
21 authors
·
review
·
Open access
38
citations
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
16 authors
·
Open access
55
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
107,380
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
13,845
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,660
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
PLoS Medicine
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
5,137
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
International Journal of Surgery
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,672
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
4,227
citations
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,479
citations
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
37 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,654
citations
Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2020
·
5 authors
·
editorial
·
Open access
95
citations
Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2020
·
4 authors
·
review
·
Open access
292
citations
When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist
BMJ
·
2020
·
55 authors
·
review
·
Open access
109
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
8,068
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
5,174
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
916
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
167
citations
PNS154 THE PRISMA 2020 STATEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF AND KEY CHANGES IN AN UPDATED GUIDELINE FOR REPORTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES
Value in Health
·
2020
·
3 authors
·
other
·
Open access
78
citations
A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis
Nature Ecology & Evolution
·
2020
·
39 authors
·
Open access
68
citations
Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2019
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
207
citations
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2019
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
7,170
citations
Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial
·
2019
·
5 authors
·
other
1,761
citations
Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis
·
2019
·
3 authors
·
other
401
citations
Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies
·
2019
·
6 authors
·
other
258
citations
Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines
JAMA Oncology
·
2019
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
45
citations
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
BMJ
·
2019
·
28 authors
·
Open access
33,067
citations
A systematic review: Tools for assessing methodological quality of human observational studies
·
2019
·
12 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
52
citations
Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics
Journal of Dentistry
·
2019
·
6 authors
·
review
53
citations
Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2018
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
86
citations
Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2018
·
4 authors
·
review
·
Open access
292
citations
Improving the conduct of systematic reviews: a process mining perspective
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2018
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
40
citations
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
BMJ Open
·
2018
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
278
citations
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Systematic Reviews
·
2018
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
508
citations
Mapping of global scientific research in comorbidity and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional analysis
PLoS ONE
·
2018
·
6 authors
·
Open access
35
citations
Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2017
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
81
citations
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
Systematic Reviews
·
2017
·
2 authors
·
review
·
Open access
768
citations
Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2017
·
15 authors
·
review
·
Open access
122
citations
Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2017
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
114
citations
Stop this waste of people, animals and money
Nature
·
2017
·
31 authors
·
Open access
284
citations
Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses: An Exercise in Mega‐silliness?
Milbank Quarterly
·
2016
·
2 authors
·
review
·
Open access
74
citations