S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson · Study
Home
/
Author
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
62 works
· latest 2025
· 4 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0002-2451-5012
Works
60 shown
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
BMJ
·
2025
·
38 authors
·
Open access
450
citations
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
BMJ
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
Open access
168
citations
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials
Nature Medicine
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
review
·
Open access
134
citations
SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
The Lancet
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
review
·
Open access
107
citations
SPIRIT 2025 Statement
JAMA
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
Open access
100
citations
SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials
PLoS Medicine
·
2025
·
38 authors
·
Open access
68
citations
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
BMJ
·
2025
·
38 authors
·
Open access
1,155
citations
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
The Lancet
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
review
·
Open access
498
citations
CONSORT 2025 Statement
JAMA
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
Open access
393
citations
CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomized trials
Nature Medicine
·
2025
·
37 authors
·
review
·
Open access
290
citations
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
BMJ
·
2025
·
38 authors
·
Open access
203
citations
CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials
PLoS Medicine
·
2025
·
38 authors
·
Open access
137
citations
Reporting of surrogate endpoints in randomised controlled trial reports (CONSORT-Surrogate): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration
BMJ
·
2024
·
35 authors
·
Open access
53
citations
A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)
Environment International
·
2024
·
26 authors
·
Open access
1,012
citations
ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis
BMJ
·
2023
·
19 authors
·
review
·
Open access
134
citations
Using Risk of Bias 2 to assess results from randomised controlled trials: guidance from Cochrane
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
·
2023
·
7 authors
·
Open access
264
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
439
citations
An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials
Nature Medicine
·
2022
·
10 authors
·
Open access
126
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
130
citations
Pravila PRISMA 2020.
Medicina Fluminensis
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
166
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
1,309
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
2,089
citations
Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances
JAMA
·
2021
·
36 authors
·
Open access
297
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
107,380
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
13,845
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,660
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
PLoS Medicine
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
5,137
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
International Journal of Surgery
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,672
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
4,227
citations
The COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2020
·
9 authors
·
editorial
·
Open access
95
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
8,068
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
5,174
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
916
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
167
citations
Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
BMJ
·
2020
·
13 authors
·
review
·
Open access
298
citations
Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies
·
2019
·
6 authors
·
other
258
citations
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
BMJ
·
2019
·
28 authors
·
Open access
33,067
citations
Randomized clinical trials with run-in periods: frequency, characteristics and reporting
Clinical Epidemiology
·
2019
·
3 authors
·
Open access
66
citations
Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations
Trials
·
2018
·
2 authors
·
Open access
83
citations
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
Systematic Reviews
·
2017
·
12 authors
·
review
·
Open access
322
citations
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
Systematic Reviews
·
2017
·
12 authors
·
review
·
Open access
75
citations
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
BMJ
·
2016
·
35 authors
·
Open access
20,225
citations
Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
PLoS ONE
·
2016
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
283
citations
Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2016
·
7 authors
·
Open access
396
citations
Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimates
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2016
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
58
citations
A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2016
·
7 authors
·
review
224
citations
A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2016
·
8 authors
985
citations
Subjective and objective outcomes in randomized clinical trials: definitions differed in methods publications and were often absent from trial reports
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2014
·
4 authors
69
citations
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
Systematic Reviews
·
2013
·
5 authors
·
review
·
Open access
62
citations
SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2013
·
19 authors
·
Open access
7,356
citations
Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
Canadian Medical Association Journal
·
2013
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
525
citations
Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors
BMJ
·
2012
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
485
citations
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
International Journal of Nursing Studies
·
2011
·
9 authors
1,002
citations
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2010
·
9 authors
2,206
citations
Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study
BMJ
·
2009
·
11 authors
·
Open access
77
citations
Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2009
·
6 authors
56
citations
Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences
JAMA
·
2007
·
4 authors
237
citations
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
International Journal of Epidemiology
·
2007
·
6 authors
·
Open access
470
citations
Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding
International Journal of Epidemiology
·
2007
·
5 authors
205
citations
Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors
Clinical Trials
·
2006
·
2 authors
150
citations