Refocusing the Burden of Proof in Criminal Cases: Some Doubt About Reasonable Doubt

Lawrence M. Solan

31 citations0/0 files storedbepress Legal Repository

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

OPINION SURVEY 46, 53 (Timothy J. Flanagan & Dennis R. Longmire eds., 1996) (finding that 67 % of those polled were "concerned about courts that do not reduce crime").One recent study showed barely half the people surveyed (56%) to agree with Blackstone's famous statement that it is better to allow ten guilty people to go free than to convict one innocent person by mistake.See

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2007The Language of Consent in Rape Law 2002Reasonable Doubt about Reasonable Doubt: Assessing Jury Instruction Adequacy in a Capital Case 2002‘If you were Standing in Marks and Spencers’: Narrativisation and Comprehension in the English Summing-up 2006Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making 2024The Philosophy of Legal Proof 2017The Standard of Proof in the Substantiation of Child Abuse and Neglect 2015The threshold lies in the method 2020Standard probatório para condenação e dúvida razoável no processo penal: análise das possíveis contribuições ao ordenamento brasileiro

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.