SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Journal Self-Citation VI: Forced Journal Self-Citation – Common, Appropriate, Ethical?
4 references·4 citing·34 second hop
Journal Self-Citation VI: Forced Journal Self-Citation – Common, Appropriate, Ethical? (2009)Journal Self-Citation VI: Forced Journal …Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse (2009)Assessing Scholarly Influence…Editor's Comments: Type II Reviewing Errors and the Search for Exciting Papers (2008)Editor's Comments: Type II Re…Editor's comments: readability and the relevance versus rigor debate (2008)Editor's comments: readabilit…Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1 (2006)Research Standards for Promot…Invited Viewpoint: How well does the Information Systems discipline fare in the Financial Times’ top 50 Journal list? (2019)Invited Viewpoint: How well d…Is Self-Citation Biased? An Investigation via the Lens of Citation Polarity, Density, and Location (2018)Is Self-Citation Biased? An I…Influence of selected factors in journals’ citations (2018)Influence of selected factors…Global Ranking of Management- and Clinical-Centered eHealth Journals (2017)Global Ranking of Management-…Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development (1985)Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics (2001)Is there Such a thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? (2006)Editor’s comments: rigor and relevance in is research: redefining the debate and a call for future research (2011)Exploring the use of the Delphi method in accounting information systems research (2012)The tourism knowledge system (2015)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update (2003)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence (2011)Publish or Perish: How Are Research and Reputation Related? (2011)A Glorious and Not-So-Short History of the Information Systems Field (2012)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Science in Action (1987)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Comparación de los índices de citas y clasificación de revistas del Journal Citation Reports y Scopus en el campo de la Psicología (2019)Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context (2021)Qualitative Content Analysis (2008)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists (2012)A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model (2016)The past and future of The Journal of Strategic Information Systems: A conversation with Bob Galliers (2020)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable (1993)The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties1 (2003)Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks1 (2008)Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline (2008)Uncovering the Intellectual Core of the Information Systems Discipline1 (2008)The Effect of an IS Article’s Structure on Its Impact (2010)The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science (2010)Open Knowledge Creation: Bringing Transparency and Inclusiveness to the Peer Review Process1 (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems1190 cited
  • 2009Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse88 cited
  • 2008Editor's comments: readability and the relevance versus rigor debate31 cited
  • 2008Editor's Comments: Type II Reviewing Errors and the Search for Exciting Papers21 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Invited Viewpoint: How well does the Information Systems discipline fare in the Financial Times’ top 50 Journal list?19 cited
  • 2018Influence of selected factors in journals’ citations18 cited
  • 2017Global Ranking of Management- and Clinical-Centered eHealth Journals14 cited
  • 2018Is Self-Citation Biased? An Investigation via the Lens of Citation Polarity, Density, and Location11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work