IS THE BEST GOOD ENOUGH

Peter Lipton

89 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

L'A. examine des formes intermediaires de scepticisme avec l'intention de demontrer que meme si les scientifiques possedent des pouvoirs considerables d'induction, la croyance rationnelle en la theorie reste impossible. Il affirme que certaines de ces formes intermediaires de scepticisme sont instables et aboutissent soit au doute radical humenien, soit au realisme modere. Il s'interesse specialement a l'argument sceptique issu de la sous-consideration

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Inference to the Best Explanation 1989Laws and symmetry

Cited by

2011Reciprocal verbs and symmetry 2015Probabilistic alternatives to Bayesianism: the case of explanationism 2001Remarks on the Economy of Pronunciation 2015The role of explanatory considerations in updating 2014The syntax of Why-Stripping 2017The heuristic conception of inference to the best explanation 2002Testing Inference To The Best Explanation 2003The Phase Impenetrability Condition, the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis, and that-t effects

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.