LEVITICUS 11, DEUTERONOMY 14 AND DIRECTIONALITY

Esias E. Meyer

6 citations0/0 files storedJournal for Semitics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Studies and Philology Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

Abstract

The article engages with the old debate about the diachronic relationship between Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14. It starts with outlining certain criteria which might help us determine directionality. It then provides a synchronic overview of the two chapters, focusing on commonalities and differences, before moving on to the diachronic debate. As part of the diachronic debate the views of Christophe Nihan and Reinhard Achenbach are contrasted and critiqued. The article then attempts to draw some conclusions from this debate.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Leviticus 1–16 1991The Limits of Interpretation 2011The Formation of the Hebrew Bible 2006The So-Called Deuteronomistic History: A Sociological, Historical, and Literary Introduction 2007From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch 2012The formation of the Hebrew Bible: a new reconstruction 2001Leviticus as Literature 2002Deuteronomy: A Commentary

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.