Planning in England: New Public Management, Network Governance or Post-Democracy?

Martin Laffin

29 citations0/0 files storedInternational Review of Administrative Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Local Governance and Planning Public Policy and Administration Research Urban Planning and Governance

Abstract

Three frameworks – New Public Management, Network Governance and Post-Democracy – are applied to identify and explain the direction of institutional travel in the field of land-use planning in England. These frameworks are used to assess the extent to which land-use planning has been centralized or decentralized over the last 20 years. The last Labour government (1997–2010) is contrasted with the Conservative-led Coalition government (2010–2015). Labour introduced planning policies and an underpinning regional administrative machinery that the latter has replaced with a ‘localist’ planning system and sub-regional Local Enterprise Partnerships. The article concludes that both Labour and the Conservative-led Coalition embarked on policies that involved increased centralization, but that the centralization took different forms, though both parties denied sub-state institutions the political or other resources to challenge the central government in Westminster. Points for practitioners The dominant analytical perspectives on public administration are New Public Management and Network Governance. This article introduces a third perspective – Post-Democracy – not yet applied in public administration. Post-Democracy is developed here to depict government ministers as ‘political-bureaucratic managers’ oriented towards maintaining national economic competitiveness and mobilizing electoral support in new ways as the traditional, mass political party is declining. Consequently, ministers increasingly defer to business interests and default to a populist politics that often challenges established bureaucratic and professional interests within government. This article examines the implications of this political shift in the case of land-use planning in England.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.

References

1996The New Governance: Governing without Government 2013Ruling The Void: The Hollowing Of Western Democracy 1994From old public administration to new public management 2007Understanding Governance: Ten Years On 2009MAKING GOVERNANCE NETWORKS EFFECTIVE AND DEMOCRATIC THROUGH METAGOVERNANCE 2003The British Regulatory State 2010Urban and Regional Planning 2011Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency

Cited by

2020Divergence in planning for affordable housing: A comparative analysis of England and Portugal 2020Posnueva gestión pública, gobernanza e innovación. Tres conceptos en torno a una forma de organización y gestión de lo público 2023Neighbourhood planning in England: A decade of institutional learning 2018Local autonomy, municipal size and local political participation in Europe 2018The community philanthropic foundation: A new form of independent public service provider for China?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.