Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research resultsLeandre R. Fabrigar, Duane T. Wegener2015-08-01articleJournal of Experimental Social Psychology165 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychology Research and BibliometricsAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 165 citations exist upstream.References2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.2011False-Positive Psychology2015Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change1991Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research1994Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.2014Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology1979Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.Cited by2015Evidence for Another Response to Ostracism2019“Rarely safe to assume”: Evaluating the use and interpretation of manipulation checks in experimental social psychology2016Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology2022Construct validity and the validity of replication studies: A systematic review.2017Too True to be Bad2019Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research2020A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology2016Are most published social psychological findings false?