Using Student Achievement Data in Teacher and Principal Evaluations: A Policy Study.

Abstract

Tennessee was one of the rst states to win Race to the Top funds in 2010, partly based on new state policy which tied student achievement measures to teacher and principal evaluations. Nearly half of state legislatures in the United States have passed similar legislation in the past two years. This article examines recent state legislative policy requiring measures of student achievement to be included in teacher and principal evaluations. note: This manuscript has been peer-reviewed, accepted, and endorsed by the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA) as a signi cant contribution to the scholarship and practice of education administration. In addition to publication in the Connexions Content Commons, this module is published in the International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, Volume 6, Number 4 (October December, 2011), ISSN 2155-9635. Formatted and edited in Connexions by Theodore Creighton and Brad Bizzell, Virginia Tech and Janet Tareilo, Stephen F. Austin State University. 1 Sumario en espanol Tennessee fue uno de los primeros estados de ganar la Carrera a los fondos Primeros en 2010, en parte basado en nueva politica de estado que ato medidas de logro de estudiante al maestro y principales evaluaciones. ∗Version 1.1: Sep 25, 2011 8:16 am GMT-5 †http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://www.ncpeapublications.org http://cnx.org/content/m41125/1.1/ Connexions module: m41125 2 Casi mitad de poderes legislativos del estado en Estados Unidos ha pasado legislacion semejante durante los ultimos dos anos. Este articulo revisa estado reciente la politica legislativa que requiere medidas de logro de estudiante para ser incluida en el maestro y principales evaluaciones. note: Esta es una traduccion por computadora de la pagina web original. Se suministra como informacion general y no debe considerarse completa ni exacta.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.