The study of wise persons: integrating a personality perspective

Lucinda Orwoll · Marion C. Perlmutter

176 citations0/0 files storedCambridge University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Aging and Gerontology Research Personality Traits and Psychology Ego Development and Educational Practices

Abstract

The primacy of cognitive explanations of wisdom in recent research has failed to incorporate personality prerequisites. Fundamental links between wisdom and adult personality development, elucidated by several personality theorists, are summarized in the first part of this chapter. We identify two key indicators of personality-based wisdom: advanced self-development and selftranscendence. Wisdom depends on an unusually integrated personality structure that enables people to transcend personalistic perspectives and embrace collective and universal concerns. We assume, however, that these personality attributes presuppose complementary cognitive development and that wisdom is rare precisely because it entails both exceptional personality and cognitive growth. In the second part of this chapter, we propose an empirical approach to the study of wisdom that capitalizes on the integration of personality and cognition by intensively studying adults who are considered wise. In this approach, subject selection is guided by nominations of wise people and measure selection is guided by both cognitive and personality theories. We elaborate how this approach can be applied to the study of wisdom by discussing useful ingredients from several other research traditions. Finally, we provide an empirical foundation for the study of wise people by summarizing current research. Personality conceptualization of wisdom Hypotheses about a personality dimension of wisdom can be drawn from three personality theorists who have dealt explicitly with wisdom: Erikson, Jung, and Kohut. Although these theorists have different orientations to personality (i.e., Erikson's psychosocial, Jung's analytical, and Kohut's object relations), each discussed self-development and self-transcendence as key attributes of the wise personality.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 176 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2000Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective 2003Positive adaptation to trauma: Wisdom as both process and outcome 2016Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills 2000Antecedents and Effects of Wisdom in Old Age 2004The Two Faces of Wisdom: Wisdom as a General Theory of Knowledge and Judgment about Excellence in Mind and Virtue vs. Wisdom as Everyday Realization in People and Products 2000The Concept of Wisdom: A Cross‐cultural Comparison 2016Wise Reasoning in the Face of Everyday Life Challenges 2005The Psychology of Wisdom

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.