Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why Both Popper and Watkins Fail to Solve the Problem of Induction

16 references·4 citing·30 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012The Open Society and Its Enemies3,505 cited
1963CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS2,853 cited
1946A History of Western Philosophy.2,021 cited
1895WHAT THE TORTOISE SAID TO ACHILLES1,490 cited
1989Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?1,285 cited
1949Human Knowledge, Its Scope and Limits1,173 cited
2013History of Western Philosophy1,080 cited
2013The Open Society and Its Enemies724 cited
2009Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits566 cited
1974POPPER'S QUALITATIVE THEORY OF VERISIMILITUDE310 cited
1984Science and Scepticism245 cited
1984Change and Progress in Modern Science153 cited
1975The accuracy of predictions113 cited
1979The Logic and epistemology of scientific change99 cited
1981Rational Prediction98 cited
1985Scientific Discovery and Theory-Confirmation83 cited

Cited by

2011From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

19 cited

2003Karl Popper and the ‘The Problem Of Induction’: A Fresh Look at the Logic of Testing Scientific Theories12 cited

2008Hypothetico-deductivism in systematics: fact or fiction?11 cited

2011On Popper’s strong inductivism (or strongly inconsistent anti-inductivism)9 cited