The Great Takeover Debate: A Meditation on Bridging the Conceptual Divide

William T. Allen · Jack B. Jacobs · Leo E. Strine

50 citations0/0 files storedThe University of Chicago Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Finance and Governance Legal Cases and Commentary Corporate Governance and Law

Abstract

William T. Allen, Jack B. Jacobs, Leo E. Strine, Jr., The Great Takeover Debate: A Meditation on Bridging the Conceptual Divide, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 69, No. 3 (Summer, 2002), pp. 1067-1100

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2003On the Proper Motives of Corporate Directors (or, Why You Don't Want to Invite Homo Economicus to Join Your Board)2004The Disappearing Delaware Effect 2013Neither Persons nor Associations 2021For Whom (and For When) is the Firm Governed? The Effect of Changes in Corporate Fiduciary Duties on Tax Strategies and Earnings Management 2016The role of governments in hostile takeovers – Evidence from regulation, anti-takeover provisions and government interventions 2002The Disappearing Delaware Effect

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.