Controversial users demand local trust metrics: An experimental study on epinions.com community

Abstract

In today's connected world it is possible and very com-mon to interact with unknown people, whose reliabil-ity is unknown. Trust Metrics are a recently proposed technique for answering questions such as \\Should I trust this user?". However, most of the current re-search assumes that every user has a global quality score and that the goal of the technique is just to pre-dict this correct value. We show, on data from a real and large user community, Epinions.com, that such an assumption is not realistic because there is a signicant portion of what we call controversial users, users who are trusted and distrusted by many. A global agree-ment about the trustworthiness value of these users cannot exist. We argue, using computational experi-ments, that the existence of controversial users (a nor-mal phenomena in societies) demands Local Trust Met-rics, techniques able to predict the trustworthiness of an user in a personalized way, depending on the very personal view of the judging user.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 345 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.