Containment and connectedness anaphors

Abstract

Introduction This chapter articulates the following hypothesis: the conditioning factor for whether an anaphor is ‘long-distance’ or ‘locally’ bound resides in a distinction between what will be called containment conditions and connectedness conditions on anaphors. The hypothesis is based mainly on properties of the anaphoric systems of Norwegian and Icelandic (sections 2.1–2.2), and the importance of the distinction is demonstrated also by interpretive facts concerning Norwegian constructions containing anaphors (section 3). Based on preliminary consideration of long-distance anaphors in certain other languages (section 2.3), our conjecture is that the hypothesis holds universally. The distinction between containment and connectedness conditions can be seen in the perspective of what relation modules exist in grammar: connectedness conditions deal with what we may call the argument module , i.e. relations defined in terms of the relation ‘argument of’, a module extensively explored in recent work (e.g. Chomsky (1986a) and related research). Containment conditions, in contrast, involve what we will call the command module , a family of relations tied together by a general notion of ‘command’, to be elucidated as we proceed. The significance of containment conditions for anaphors brings to light the status of the command module as an independent and potentially significant module in the grammar.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 29 citations exist upstream.