Confidence Intervals in a Gauge R&R Study with Fixed Operators

Lorraine Daniels · Richard K. Burdick · Jorge Quiroz

18 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Quality Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring Optimal Experimental Design Methods Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop a method for constructing confidence intervals in a two-factor gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study with fixed operators. A previously proposed method is compared with a generalized confidence interval method using computer simulation. Simulation results suggest that, although the two methods are comparable in most cases, there are situations where the generalized confidence interval is a better choice.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

2003A Review of Methods for Measurement Systems Capability Analysis 2000Measurement System Assessment via Generalized Inference 2003Confidence Intervals for a Discrimination Ratio in a Gauge R&R Study with Three Random Factors

Cited by

2007Gauge capability studies for attribute data 2015Analysis on Accuracy of Bias, Linearity and Stability of Measurement System in Ball screw Processes by Simulation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.