Systematic reviews: what they are, why they are important, and how to get involved

Heather MacKenzie · Ann Dewey · Amy Drahota · Sally A. Kilburn · Paul R. Kalra · Carole Fogg

36 citations0/0 files storedePrints Soton (University of Southampton)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Sciences Research and Education Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

This article introduces systematic reviews and their purpose, and considerations in understanding and appraising reviews. The processes involved in planning and conducting a review are summarized, and resources for new reviewers are listed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies 2008Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis 2008Searching for Studies 2008Selecting Studies and Collecting Data

Cited by

2023Circular economy in construction: A systematic review of knowledge gaps towards a novel research framework 2022Paperfetcher : A tool to automate handsearching and citation searching for systematic reviews

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.