SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
In Defense of Judicial Empathy
0 references·2 citing·10 second hop
In Defense of Judicial Empathy (2012)In Defense of Judicial EmpathyThe European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context (2016)The European Journal of Psych…‘I know how they must feel’: Empathy and judging defendants (2014)‘I know how they must feel’: …Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. (1983)Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. (1983)Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. (1992)Strengths and Weaknesses of Two Empathy Measures: A Comparison of the Measurement Precision, Construct Validity, and Incremental Validity of Two Multidimensional Indices (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)Family Profile of Young Offenders Who Abuse Their Parents: A Comparison With General Offenders and Non-Offenders (2014)Social Information Processing in Child-to-Parent Aggression: Bidirectional Associations in a 1-Year Prospective Study (2014)Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Latin America: A Systematic Review (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2016The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context161 cited
  • 2014‘I know how they must feel’: Empathy and judging defendants16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work