No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The regional transformation into development spaces and the regional development policies,\nimplemented for more than two decades, adopted a global-local form. This structure\ndisregards the hierarchy of actors who control the global networks and underestimates the\nrole of national scales and trajectories � essential in order to understand the conditions,\ncapacities and limitations of regional dynamics. With the purpose of recovering such scales\nand trajectories, this paper uses a critical analysis of the capitalism varieties approach,\ndeveloped at the central countries. To that purpose, a group of elements is indicated,\nin order to: i) surpass the limitations of this approach; ii) recognize the periphery�s specificities\nand the divergent interests that emerge once that national trajectories are analyzed under\nthe new contradictory scenery of capitalism; iii) identify, within the periphery, the\npotentialities that allow for �big changes� necessary to get out of this position. Through the\ncontrast of East Asia and Latin America national trajectories, three strongly interrelated\nelements are analyzed, in order to identify potencialities to: a) forge an endogenous and\ndynamic accumulation nucleus, b) develop a multiscaled national epicenter, that avoids\ndecentralizating fragmentation and supranational subordination; c) build a highly qualified\nState, committed to the development of �a� and �b�. Capitalizing on this results, and\nholding a latin american positioning, diagnostic-strategical agendas are formulated to insert\nregional development policies into the three above mentioned items.
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.