SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review
16 references·6 citing·40 second hop
Preventing domestic abuse for children and young people (PEACH): a mixed knowledge scoping review (2015)Preventing domestic abuse for children an…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)An Introduction to Systematic…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels (2009)Evaluating Training Programs …A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial. (2009)A school-based program to pre…Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research (2008)Sampling Knowledge: The Herme…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Appraising the quality of qualitative research (2005)Appraising the quality of qua…Assessing the Long-Term Effects of the Safe Dates Program and a Booster in Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration (2004)Assessing the Long-Term Effec…Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1 (2003)Evidence, hierarchies, and ty…An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. (1998)An evaluation of Safe Dates, …Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. (1982)Sexual Experiences Survey: A …Dating violence prevention programs for at-risk adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Dating violence prevention pr…Family focused interventions that address parental domestic violence and abuse, mental ill-health, and substance misuse in combination: A systematic review (2022)Family focused interventions …The Change Up Project: Using Social Norming Theory with Young People to Address Domestic Abuse and Promote Healthy Relationships (2018)The Change Up Project: Using …The power of feminist pedagogy in Australia: vagina shorts and the primary prevention of violence against women (2017)The power of feminist pedagog…“Talking about child sexual abuse would have helped me”: Young people who sexually abused reflect on preventing harmful sexual behavior (2017)“Talking about child sexual a…‘We have personal experience to share, it makes it real’: Young people's views on their role in sexual violence prevention efforts (2017)‘We have personal experience …Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. (1956)The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? (2018)Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: Recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia (2018)The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs (2022)A Realist Theory of Science. (1977)62. Realism with a Human Face (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The flawed four‐level evaluation model (1996)A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence (2004)The Science of Training and Development in Organizations (2012)Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. (1987)Everyday Sexism: Evidence for Its Incidence, Nature, and Psychological Impact From Three Daily Diary Studies (2001)Revising the SES: A Collaborative Process to Improve Assessment of Sexual Aggression and Victimization (2007)Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2009Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels4,738 cited
  • 2008Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research3,365 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,187 cited
  • 1982Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.1,444 cited
  • 2013An Introduction to Systematic Reviews1,235 cited
  • 1998An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program.633 cited
  • 2003Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1540 cited
  • 2005Appraising the quality of qualitative research523 cited
  • 2004

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Assessing the Long-Term Effects of the Safe Dates Program and a Booster in Preventing and Reducing Adolescent Dating Violence Victimization and Perpetration
522 cited
  • 2009A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial.470 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses385 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017“Talking about child sexual abuse would have helped me”: Young people who sexually abused reflect on preventing harmful sexual behavior68 cited
    • 2017The power of feminist pedagogy in Australia: vagina shorts and the primary prevention of violence against women25 cited
    • 2017‘We have personal experience to share, it makes it real’: Young people's views on their role in sexual violence prevention efforts25 cited
    • 2018The Change Up Project: Using Social Norming Theory with Young People to Address Domestic Abuse and Promote Healthy Relationships24 cited
    • 2022Family focused interventions that address parental domestic violence and abuse, mental ill-health, and substance misuse in combination: A systematic review23 cited
    • 2023Dating violence prevention programs for at-risk adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis23 cited