SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology surgery
9 references·1 citing·41 second hop
A systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology surgery (2014)A systematic review of the quality of ran…Do Surgical Trials Meet the Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials? (2012)Do Surgical Trials Meet the S…CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updat…Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Extending the CONSORT Stateme…The write position (2007)The write positionThe reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review (2007)The reporting quality of rand…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology (1998)A qualitative assessment of r…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasReporting quality of surgical randomised controlled trials in head and neck cancer: a systematic review (2021)Reporting quality of surgical…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in High-Quality Surgical Journals (2009)Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality (2013)Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials—Distance Travelled (2017)Innovation and Tribulation in the History of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery (2019)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis (2008)Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position (2010)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)Reporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review (2010)Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: Review of adherence to the CONSORT statement (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses (2014)Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used (2018)An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services (2022)CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Evaluating the completeness of the reporting of abstracts since the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts: an evaluation of randomized controlled trial in ten nursing journals (2023)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,041 cited
  • 2007The write position202 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 2007The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review142 cited
  • 1998A qualitative assessment of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology46 cited
  • 2012Do Surgical Trials Meet the Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials?33 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Reporting quality of surgical randomised controlled trials in head and neck cancer: a systematic review12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work