Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Measuring health-related utility:

16 references·2 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States4,543 cited
2002The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-363,031 cited
2000A Comparative Review of Generic Quality-of-Life Instruments824 cited
2004A comparison of the EQ‐5D and SF‐6D across seven patient groups797 cited
2001A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments471 cited
1999A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.414 cited
1993Measuring quality of life in stroke.321 cited
2001NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies299 cited
2000Problems With the Interpretation of Pharmacoeconomic Analyses224 cited
2003An empirical comparison of EQ‐5D and SF‐6D in liver transplant patients184 cited
1997Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values123 cited
2004Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ‐5D and AQoL123 cited
2002Health utility estimation109 cited
1993Social Evaluation of Health Care Versus Personal Evaluation of Health States:Evidence on the Validity of Four Health-state Scaling Instruments Using Norwegian and Australian Surveys105 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF‐6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index95 cited

2000Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication92 cited

Cited by

2009The Impact of Differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D Utility Scores on the Acceptability of Cost–Utility Ratios: Results across Five Trial-Based Cost–Utility Studies68 cited
2010Comparing the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and 15D utilities to the specific effect of diabetic complications65 cited