Aristotle and Byzantine Iconoclasm

Thalia Anagnostopoulos

46 citations0/0 files storedGreek, Roman and Byzantine studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Byzantine Studies and History Classical Philosophy and Thought Historical and Religious Studies of Rome

Abstract

The defense of icons shifted gradually from a theory of mimesis to Aristotelian symbolism; this reflected not a revival of learning but arguments developed in the debate itself and hinted at already by Constantine V and at the Council of 787.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017Astrology 2017The Hesychast Controversy 2017Rhetoric and Rhetorical Theory 2017Byzantine Literary Criticism and the Classical Heritage 2017Classical Scholarship: The Byzantine Contribution 2017Theological Debates with the West, 1054–1300 2017Philosophy and “Byzantine Philosophy”2017Alchemy

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.