Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Use and Misuse of Biomedical Data: Is Bigger Really Better?

7 references·5 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
1973Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability9,980 cited
2007Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography1,532 cited
1999Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation756 cited
1999Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association754 cited
2004Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society69 cited

Cited by

2024The Sociodemographic Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms: A Biomedical Informatics Perspective76 cited
2019HR analytics and ethics42 cited
2016The RECORD reporting guidelines: meeting the methodological and ethical demands of transparency in research using routinely-collected health data30 cited
2024Emotion AI Use in U.S. Mental Healthcare: Potentially Unjust and Techno-Solutionist15 cited
2016Reporting and Transparency in Big Data: The Nexus of Ethics and Methodology11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work