SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publish or perish: Where are we heading?
0 references·16 citing·56 second hop
Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Publish or perish: Where are we heading?The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)The Peer Review Process: Past…Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors (2023)Gender inequality and self-pu…Scientific research in news media: a case study of misrepresentation, sensationalism and harmful recommendations (2022)Scientific research in news m…And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists (2022)And the credit goes to … - Gh…Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research (2020)Publish or be ethical? Publis…A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)A review of the current conce…The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials (2019)The significant cost of syste…The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences (2019)The perceived causes of resea…Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study (2019)Perspectives From Authors and…Mapping pharmacy journals: A lexicographic analysis (2019)Mapping pharmacy journals: A …Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed (2019)Frequency and format of clini…Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review (2018)Reproducible and replicable p…Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Modelling science trustworthi…China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot (2018)China’s science, technology, …Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences (2017)Journal selection criteria in…A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology (2017)A Systems-Based Approach to F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high (2020)Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation (2020)Using PROGRESS-plus to identify current approaches to the collection and reporting of equity-relevant data: a scoping review (2023)The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: A comparative analysis (2021)Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements (2023)A General Theory of Crime (1990)National Center for Education Statistics (2008)Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys (2014)A bibliometric analysis of academic misconduct research in higher education: Current status and future research opportunities (2020)Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA (2020)Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)Interventions to reduce partisan animosity (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator (2024)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)Development of Prompt Templates for Large Language Model–Driven Screening in Systematic Reviews (2025)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm (1993)Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power (2007)Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015 (2015)Production management of digital content for social media in the department of communication and informatic Batang Central Java (2022)Hot Topic: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Heat-Related Messages During the 2021 Heat Dome in Canada (2023)The rise of negative portrayals of radiation oncology: A textual analysis of media news (2023)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context (2011)Human‐ and AI ‐based authorship: Principles and ethics (2023)Gaming the metrics: bibliometric anomalies in global university rankings and the research integrity risk index (RI2) (2025)Gaming the Metrics? Bibliometric Anomalies and the Integrity Crisis in Global University Rankings (2025)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015)Higher-order structures of local collaboration networks are associated with individual scientific productivity (2024)The prominent and heterogeneous gender disparities in scientific novelty: Evidence from biomedical doctoral theses (2024)Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers (2025)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)AI-powered peer review needs human supervision (2024)Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause (2024)The assisted Technology dilemma: a reflection on AI chatbots use and risks while reshaping the peer review process in scientific research (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
  • 2019The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials151 cited
  • 2018Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review150 cited
  • 2024The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future113 cited
  • 2023Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors85 cited
  • 2022And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists79 cited
  • 2019Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed72 cited
  • 2019Mapping pharmacy journals: A lexicographic analysis72 cited
  • 2022Scientific research in news media: a case study of misrepresentation, sensationalism and harmful recommendations71 cited
  • 2019The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences69 cited
  • 2020Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research64 cited
  • 2018China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot62 cited
  • 2020A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited
  • 2017A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology52 cited
  • 2017Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences50 cited
  • 2019Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study48 cited