Cluster network and innovation under transitional economies

Zheng He · Lez Rayman‐Bacchus

19 citations0/0 files storedChinese Management Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Regional Development and Innovation Innovation and Knowledge Management Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Abstract

Purpose Firms in the same industry often display a striking propensity to agglomerate. These geographic concentrations significantly affect innovative behavior of individual firms and therefore have important strategic implications. The purpose of this paper is to report on how networks within the cluster influence firms' commitment to innovation. Design/methodology/approach Employing a longitudinal case study approach data were collected for 2004 and 2007 about the Shaxi garment cluster in Zhongshan, China. A novel method of measuring innovative behavior was developed and tested at the level of individual small and medium sized enterprises, where R&D expenditure is not recorded, by measuring managerial perception of developments in three areas: product, process, and market development. Findings The extent to which related firms, various associations, and government policies affected the individual firm's propensity to innovate was examined. The main findings of this paper show firm‐level commitment to innovation is significantly stimulated by three groups of factors: competitor action and cooperation in the supply chain, membership of various government and industry associations and government stimulus policies in the cluster. The relative significance and nature of these influences do change over time. Originality/value Disincentives to firm innovation were also found, such as knowledge spillover between competitors, leading to free rider problem, weak intellectual property right protection leading to imitation, and underground economy in the cluster resulting from weak implementation of regulation compounded by the difficulties of effectively policing regulation. These factors appear to be particularly strong in a developing economy.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness 1991The Competitive Advantage of Nations 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations 1979Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).1993Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations 1977The Population Ecology of Organizations 2010National Systems of Innovation 2002Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness

Cited by

2018Inter-organizational relationships involving SMEs: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art 2019Does the Multiple-Participant Innovation Improve Regional Innovation Efficiency? A Study of China’s Regional Innovation Systems 2021A Systems Perspective in Examining Industry Clusters: Case Studies of Clusters in Russia and India 2019Do Industrial Clusters Still Matter to Trust-Building in the Internet Era? A Network Embeddedness Perspective 2020Innovation and the network position of firms: the case of the Eskişehir–Bilecik–Kütahya ceramic cluster in Turkey

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.