Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Accuracy of Non‐traditional versus Traditional Methods of Forecasting Lumpy Demand

16 references·2 citing·31 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1982The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition1,465 cited
1992Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons1,400 cited
1972Forecasting and Stock Control for Intermittent Demands761 cited
2004The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates498 cited
1996Neural Network Models for Time Series Forecasts468 cited
2004On the categorization of demand patterns432 cited
2001On the bias of intermittent demand estimates363 cited
1992The evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods265 cited
1994Forecasting intermittent demand in manufacturing: a comparative evaluation of Croston's method236 cited
2003Evaluation of forecasting methods for intermittent parts demand in the field of aviation: a predictive model235 cited
2007Lumpy demand forecasting using neural networks220 cited
2004Forecasting for the ordering and stock-holding of spare parts214 cited
1996Forecasting for Items with Intermittent Demand199 cited
2006Classification for forecasting and stock control: a case study164 cited
2000Neural network versus econometric models in forecasting inflation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

155 cited

1982Note. Evaluation of extrapolative forecasting methods: Results of a survey of academicians and practitioners138 cited

Cited by

2021Cross‐item learning for volatile demand forecasting: An intervention with predictive analytics44 cited
2020On the empirical performance of some new neural network methods for forecasting intermittent demand41 cited