SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
On Juries and Damage Awards: The Process of Decisionmaking
2 references·12 citing·37 second hop
On Juries and Damage Awards: The Process of Decisionmaking (1989)On Juries and Damage Awards: The Process …Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries (1976)Section 12 of the Canada Evid…The University of Chicago Jury Project (1959)The University of Chicago Jur…Accounting for crime in the neoliberal world (2019)Accounting for crime in the n…The gist of juries: Testing a model of damage award decision making. (2015)The gist of juries: Testing a…WHAT IS THE PRICE OF CRIME? NEW ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION (2009)WHAT IS THE PRICE OF CRIME? N…"Shouldn't we consider...?": Jury discussions of forbidden topics and effects on damage awards. (2008)"Shouldn't we consider...?": …The impact of jury instructions on the fusion of liability and compensatory damages. (2001)The impact of jury instructio…The effects of limiting punitive damage awards. (2001)The effects of limiting punit…What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making. (2000)What's half a lung worth? Civ…Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities. (2000)Instructing jurors on general…Double discounting: The effects of comparative negligence on mock juror decision making. (1999)Double discounting: The effec…Psycholegal Research on Jury Damage Awards (1998)Psycholegal Research on Jury …David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases (1994)David, Goliath, and reverend …Jury Decision Making (1992)Jury Decision MakingTelling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce (1979)Psychological jurisprudence and the information processing paradigm (1993)Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. (1995)Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism (2005)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)The American Jury (1971)Civil Juries and Civil Justice (2007)The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case (2009)The Contemporary American Jury (2018)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Disentangling the Power Bases of Sexual Harassment: Comparing Gender, Age, and Position Power (2000)Jury decision making: the state of the science (2013)Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. (1994)Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999)Blood Money, New Money, and the Moral Economy of Tort Law in Action (2001)Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (1981)Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making (2006)All anchors are not created equal: The effects of per diem versus lump sum requests on pain and suffering awards. (2009)Psychological Injuries and Legal Decision Making in Civil Cases: What We Know and What We Do not Know (2013)The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. (1958)Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System. And Why Not? (1992)The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? (1999)Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: The view from the bench and the jury box. (2003)Crisis, What Crisis? Perception and Reality in Civil Justice (2007)Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. (1975)Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis. (2016)Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making (2005)Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition (2007)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Working memory and cognitive load in the legal system: Influences on police shooting decisions, interrogation and jury decisions. (2016)Numeracy in the jury box: Numerical ability, meaningful anchors, and damage award decision making (2019)Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior (1978)On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. (1997)Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1959The University of Chicago Jury Project95 cited
  • 1976Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the Deliberations of Simulated Juries69 cited

Cited by

  • 1999Double discounting: The effects of comparative negligence on mock juror decision making.36 cited
  • 2001The impact of jury instructions on the fusion of liability and compensatory damages.32 cited
  • 2015The gist of juries: Testing a model of damage award decision making.32 cited
  • 2000What's half a lung worth? Civil jurors' accounts of their award decision making.25 cited
  • 2000Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities.24 cited
  • 1994David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases24 cited
  • 2001The effects of limiting punitive damage awards.21 cited
  • 1992Jury Decision Making14 cited
  • 2019Accounting for crime in the neoliberal world12 cited
  • 2008"Shouldn't we consider...?": Jury discussions of forbidden topics and effects on damage awards.11 cited
  • 2009WHAT IS THE PRICE OF CRIME? NEW ESTIMATES OF THE COST OF CRIMINAL VICTIMIZATION11 cited
  • 1998Psycholegal Research on Jury Damage Awards9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work