SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria
11 references·16 citing·36 second hop
Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria (1998)Comparative analysis of a set of bibliome…The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research (1996)The use of multiple indicator…Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)Advanced bibliometric methods…New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)New bibliometric tools for th…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985 (1989)Scientometric datafiles. A co…Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (1988)Handbook of Quantitative Stud…The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance (1985)The use of bibliometric data …Assessing basic research (1983)Assessing basic researchScientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science (1967)Scientific Output and Recogni…Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science (1966)Some Correlates of a Citation…Criteria for scientific choice (1963)Criteria for scientific choiceMeasuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics (2019)Measuring Science: Basic Prin…Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping (2014)Advances in bibliometric anal…The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective (2011)The first Italian research as…Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)Assessing the citation impact…Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists (2011)Are female researchers less c…A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals (2011)A bibliometric investigation …The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics? (2010)The Assessment of Research Qu…Do rankings reflect research quality? (2010)Do rankings reflect research …A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact (2010)A bibliometric classificatory…Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs (2009)Looking for Landmarks: The Ro…Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)Allocative efficiency in publ…Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? (2007)Are international co-publicat…Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2005)Citation rates and perception…A Bibliometric Analysis (2005)A Bibliometric AnalysisPeer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university (2004)Peer reviews and bibliometric…Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers (2003)Indicator‐assisted evaluation…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories (2008)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence (2003)Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000 (2005)Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis (2008)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos (1999)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The Republic of science (1962)The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory (2000)The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments (2003)Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications (2008)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. (1973)Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. (2003)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: A bibliometric review (2022)Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. (1978)Assessment of world aerosol research trends by bibliometric analysis (2008)Analysis and Visualization of Citation Networks (2015)National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared (1994)Towards a theory of the technology-based firm (1998)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1967Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science648 cited
  • 1983Assessing basic research528 cited
  • 1995New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications499 cited
  • 1985The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance471 cited
  • 1988Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology445 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 1996Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises383 cited
  • 1996The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research356 cited
  • 1989Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985273 cited
  • 1966Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science206 cited
  • 1963Criteria for scientific choice171 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists192 cited
  • 2010A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact183 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?
182 cited
  • 2004Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university177 cited
  • 2010Do rankings reflect research quality?171 cited
  • 2008Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?170 cited
  • 2009Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs168 cited
  • 2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics162 cited
  • 2011Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus160 cited
  • 2014Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping152 cited
  • 2005A Bibliometric Analysis144 cited
  • 2005Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution135 cited
  • 2010The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics?130 cited
  • 2003Indicator‐assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers125 cited
  • 2011The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective114 cited
  • 2011A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals113 cited