Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Are patenting scientists the better scholars?

16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies7,046 cited
1995The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.4,406 cited
1998Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation2,884 cited
1998Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research2,575 cited
2005Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation2,078 cited
1998Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation1,836 cited
2001Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make?1,488 cited
1997The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science1,285 cited
2002Universities and the global knowledge economy : a triple helix of university-industry-government relations1,205 cited
2002The future of ideas: the fate of the commons in a connected world1,042 cited
1992Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time765 cited
2005Industry funding and university professors’ research performance747 cited
1997Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies745 cited
2003Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

685 cited

1984Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science674 cited

2005Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis652 cited

Cited by

2009Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks236 cited
2010Evidence on how academics manage their portfolio of knowledge transfer activities180 cited
2010Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies169 cited
2009Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society158 cited
2011Inventors and Entrepreneurs in Academia: What Types of Skills and Experience Matter?155 cited
2008Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research147 cited
2009Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display146 cited
2007Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activity128 cited
2018Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer124 cited
2007Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents113 cited
2014University patenting: a comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide100 cited
2020The multiple faces of the entrepreneurial university: a review of the prevailing theoretical approaches91 cited
2009Transferring science-based technologies to industry—Does nanotechnology make a difference?87 cited
2013Grace, gold, or glory? Exploring incentives for invention disclosure in the university context80 cited
2008Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names72 cited
2020Red Giants or Black Holes? The Antecedent Conditions and Multilevel Impacts of Star Performers71 cited