The Past from God's Perspective : A Commentary on John's Gospel

Scott Gambrill Sinclair

4 citations0/0 files storedDominican Scholar (Dominican University of California)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Karl Barth and Christian Theology Historical and Linguistic Studies

Abstract

The Gospel of John presents a special challenge to this series because the gospel claims to give us a trustworthy account of who Jesus was, and yet, critical scholars know that John is not as historically accurate as the other gospels. John’s picture of Jesus—both of what he said and did— differs profoundly from that in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. These other gospels are earlier than John and fit much more closely with conditions in Palestine when Jesus lived. Nevertheless, the Gospel of John explicitly asserts both that its principal author knew Jesus personally and that what he wrote is true.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

References

1980The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text 1975Life After Life: The Investigation of a Phenomenon--Survival of Bodily Death 1987The mystical way in the fourth Gospel: Crossing over into God 1989The fourth Gospel and its predecessor

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.