SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education?
0 references·3 citing·10 second hop
The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education? (1993)The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deferen…Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony – A Structural Analysis (2018)Decisional Dimensions in Expe…An English Daubert? Law, Forensic Science and Epistemic Deference (2015)An English Daubert? Law, Fore…Expert evidence in reports and courts (2013)Expert evidence in reports an…Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony (2011)Epistemic authority: a theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief (2013)Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 (1989)Misunderstanding Science? (1996)Rethinking Expertise (2007)Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts (2019)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)The Scientific Image (1980)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1996)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony – A Structural Analysis12 cited
  • 2013Expert evidence in reports and courts12 cited
  • 2015An English Daubert? Law, Forensic Science and Epistemic Deference7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work