Politics of Sex Appeal in Advertising

Abstract

Olga FedorenkoOlga Fedorenko is Assistant Professor/Faculty Fellow at the Department of East Asian Studies at New York University. Her book project, Flower of Capitalism: South Korean Advertising at a Crossroads, takes an anthropological approach to advertising consumption, production, and censorship in the South Korea of the 2000s. Her essay, “South Korean Advertising as Popular Culture,” appeared in The Korean Popular Culture Reader (edited by Kyung Hyun Kim and Youngmin Choe, Duke University Press, 2014). E-mail: This article is an ethnographic exploration of how gender ideologies were negotiated in the South Korea of the 2000s, in advertising texts and in advertising workplaces. Advertising has been criticized for reproducing gender stereotypes, and it is easy to assume that it is men within advertising agencies who are responsible for the objectifying and sexualizing portrayals of women. Yet behind some of the raciest South Korean advertising campaigns were ambitious women, who not only eagerly repeated the marketing adage that “sex sells” but also, provocatively, attempted to obliterate the lingering patriarchal norms and double sexual standards—with sexualized advertising. This article examines the politics of sex appeal in contemporary South Korean advertising by drawing on participant observation at an advertising agency, interviews, and public discourse analysis. Having situated the women's interventions within the cultural–historical context of South Korea, I, first, show how women's embrace of the sex-appeal aesthetic was a strategy to succeed in a male-dominated work environment and, second, detail how fighting gender discrimination with sex-appeal advertising was a profoundly contradictory project. I suggest that the politics of sex appeal in advertising was symptomatic of how women's struggles for equality were collapsing into neoliberal post-feminist sensibility.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.