SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reversal, Dissent, and Variability in State Supreme Courts: The Centrality of Jurisdictional Source
4 references·4 citing·32 second hop
Reversal, Dissent, and Variability in State Supreme Courts: The Centrality of Jurisdictional Source (2008)Reversal, Dissent, and Variability in Sta…Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics (2008)Case Selection and the Study …Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance (2003)Fear of Reversal as an Explan…Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for Litigation (1996)Explaining Deviations from th…The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)The Selection of Disputes for…How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of the Norwegian and Danish Supreme Courts (2020)How Docket Control Shapes Jud…A Market-Based Model of State Supreme Court News: Lessons from Capital Cases (2014)A Market-Based Model of State…Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts (2012)Judges, Litigants, and the De…The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency (2010)The Implications of High Cour…Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court (1988)The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions (1994)Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals (1998)Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of Appeals (2007)Rule Creation in a Political Hierarchy (2010)Improving Predictions using Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging (2012)Deciding to decide: agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court (1992)The choices justices make (1997)Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions (2000)Is Bigger Always Better? On Optimal Panel Size, with Evidence from the Supreme Court of Canada (2011)Suing alma mater: higher education and the courts (2014)Panel selection on high courts (2015)An Economic Theory of Democracy. (1958)The Structure of Foreign News (1965)Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. (1980)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations (2004)The Government Deference Dimension of Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from the Supreme Court of Norway (2020)Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2000)Institutions that define the policymaking role of courts: A comparative analysis of the supreme courts of Scandinavia (2023)The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples (1977)Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data (2003)Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel (2011)Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics (2012)Precedent and Doctrine in a Complicated World (2017)The Legal Environments of Organizations (1997)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Probability Neglect: Emotions, Worst Cases, and Law (2002)Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2003)Economic Analysis of Contract Law after Three Decades: Success or Failure? (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1984The Selection of Disputes for Litigation1,283 cited
  • 1996Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for Litigation374 cited
  • 2003Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance140 cited
  • 2008Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics53 cited

Cited by

  • 2012Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts19 cited
  • 2020How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of the Norwegian and Danish Supreme Courts17 cited
  • 2010The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency16 cited
  • 2014A Market-Based Model of State Supreme Court News: Lessons from Capital Cases11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work