Two Approaches for Improving the Dual Response Method in Robust Parameter Design

Guillermo Miró-Quesada · Enrique Del Castillo

42 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Quality Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Optimal Experimental Design Methods Advanced Statistical Methods and Models Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

Abstract

The prediction properties of models used in the dual response approach to robust parameter design are studied, and two procedures that improve the performance of the approach are proposed. The first procedure suggests scaling of the noise variables to reduce the expected mean squared error of the variance model, based on the concept that the range of the noise variables used in the experimental design should contain most of their distribution. Naturally, the scaling improves the fit of the part of the model associated with the noise factors. However, it is shown that such scaling does not alter the variance contribution of the noise factors, which is fundamental for robust parameter design. The second procedure combines the variance due to the noise factors with the variance due to the prediction error of the fitted model (i.e., it looks at the variance of the predictions), thus considering all sources of variability present in the problem. An unbiased estimator of this combined variance is developed. Two examples are given for each procedure. The second proposed approach is compared with the dual response approach recommended in the literature by means of the prediction intervals of the responses, as recently discussed by Myers et al. (1997). It is found in the examples that the new procedure gives narrower intervals (50% and 12% percent smaller) where the degree of improvement depends, as expected, on the goodness of fit of the response surface model. The resulting solutions thus obtained are robust to both noise factor and parameter estimation uncertainty. Negative variance values, possible in the usual dual response approach in the literature, are avoided in the new formulation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 2008Introduction to Quality Engineering 1990Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach 1992Response Surface Alternatives to the Taguchi Robust Parameter Design Approach 1991Economical Experimentation Methods for Robust Design 1989Graphical Assessment of the Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs 1994How to Achieve a Robust Process Using Response Surface Methodology 1996A Generalized Linear Modeling Approach to Robust Design

Cited by

2005Optimal Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.