Limited Incontestability for Small-Firm Patents

William Kingston

8 citations0/0 files storedArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intellectual Property and Patents Intellectual Property Law Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Abstract

The remarkable success of the US 1983 Orphan Drug act might be replicated for small-firm patents by adopting its provision of a limited term during which the protection cannot be questioned.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

1962The Calculus of Consent.1997Shamans, software, and spleens: law and the construction of the information society 1904The Works of Thomas Jefferson 1998Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents 1994A Manifesto concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs 1997Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights.2003When means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation 2000Reforming the Patent System

Cited by

2018Organisational ambidexterity in UK high-tech SMEs

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.