SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Updating Systematic Reviews
0 references·16 citing·50 second hop
Updating Systematic Reviews (2007)Updating Systematic ReviewsSystematic online living evidence summaries: emerging tools to accelerate evidence synthesis (2023)Systematic online living evid…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews (2023)Guidance to Best Tools and Pr…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Updating systematic reviews (2017)Updating systematic reviewsAssessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study (2016)Assessing the validity of abb…A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of article selection for medical systematic reviews (2016)A comparative analysis of sem…The predictive validity of quality of evidence grades for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study (2015)The predictive validity of qu…Average effect estimates remain similar as evidence evolves from single trials to high-quality bodies of evidence: a meta-epidemiologic study (2015)Average effect estimates rema…Advanced analytics for the automation of medical systematic reviews (2015)Advanced analytics for the au…Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials (2014)Automating risk of bias asses…Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods (2013)Modernizing the systematic re…A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews (2012)A Comparison of Statistical M…Mapping randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema - The GREAT database (The Global Resource of Eczema Trials: a collection of key data on randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema from 2000 to 2010) (2011)Mapping randomized controlled…Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence (2011)Decisions to update comparati…A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2010)A descriptive analysis of chi…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011)Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration (2016)A Multi-Channel Convolutional Neural Network approach to automate the citation screening process (2021)Enhancing systematic reviews: An in-depth analysis on the impact of active learning parameter combinations for biomedical abstract screening (2024)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Registered trials address questions already answered with high-certainty evidence: A sample of current redundant research (2021)Automating Quality Assessment of Medical Evidence in Systematic Reviews: Model Development and Validation Study (2023)High certainty evidence is stable and trustworthy, whereas evidence of moderate or lower certainty may be equally prone to being unstable (2024)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Classifying Positive Results in Clinical Psychology Using Natural Language Processing (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Evidence Base for Interventions Delivered to Children in Primary Care: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews (2011)Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations? (2017)A Decade of Efforts to Add Value to Child Health Research Practices (2023)Sleep Disruptions in Parents of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Illnesses: Prevalence, Causes, and Consequences (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Mapping Systematic Reviews on Atopic Eczema—An Essential Resource for Dermatology Professionals and Researchers (2013)Validation of the global resource of eczema trials (GREAT database) (2015)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics (2017)Improving the conduct of systematic reviews: a process mining perspective (2018)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Assessment of a method to detect signals for updating systematic reviews (2014)Citation Discovery Tools for Conducting Adaptive Meta-analyses to Update Systematic Reviews (2016)Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (2017)Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error (2018)Machine learning methods for research highlight prediction in biomedical effects of nanomaterial application (2018)Reducing Literature Screening Workload With Machine Learning (2023)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies (2024)Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews (2025)Using artificial intelligence tools to automate data extraction for living evidence syntheses (2025)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion in JBI qualitative systematic reviews: a methodological scoping review (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2013Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods51 cited
  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews45 cited
  • 2023Systematic online living evidence summaries: emerging tools to accelerate evidence synthesis35 cited
  • 2011Mapping randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema - The GREAT database (The Global Resource of Eczema Trials: a collection of key data on randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema from 2000 to 2010)35 cited
  • 2016A comparative analysis of semi-supervised learning: The case of article selection for medical systematic reviews35 cited
  • 2012A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identifying Out-of-Date Systematic Reviews34 cited
  • 2015Advanced analytics for the automation of medical systematic reviews33 cited
  • 2014Automating risk of bias assessment for clinical trials28 cited
  • 2015The predictive validity of quality of evidence grades for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study24 cited
  • 2010A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews24 cited
  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews20 cited
  • 2016Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Updating systematic reviews19 cited
  • 2015Average effect estimates remain similar as evidence evolves from single trials to high-quality bodies of evidence: a meta-epidemiologic study17 cited
  • 2023Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews17 cited
  • 2011Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence17 cited