‘Victims’ Versus ‘Offenders’ in B ritish Political Discourse: The Construction of a False Dichotomy

Abstract

Abstract This article evaluates the contemporary discursive status of victims and people convicted of criminal offences. The rhetoric used byBritish politicians to convey the meaning of ‘rights’ is explored within media output, parliamentary speech‐making and other forms of political discourse. Our analysis details how victims’ rights are sometimes advocated for at the expense of ‘offenders’ ’ rights in public discourse. Examination of parliamentary debates illustrates that differentiating between ‘victims’ and ‘offenders’ elides consideration of more meaningful support for victims, worsens opportunities for the reintegration of ex‐prisoners and constructs a false dichotomy between citizens who do not fall into mutually‐exclusive categories.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.