SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The number needed to read—a new measure of journal value
0 references·4 citing·14 second hop
The number needed to read—a new measure of journal value (2005)The number needed to read—a new measure o…Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study (2020)Using the Cochrane Central Re…Publikationen aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum in Zeitschriften mit hohem Impact Factor: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Suchfilters (2018)Publikationen aus dem deutsch…Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? (2017)Is there an optimum number ne…An experimental search strategy retrieves more precise results than PubMed and Google for questions about medical interventions (2015)An experimental search strate…Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)A Systematic Review on the Sufficiency of PubMed and Google Scholar for Biosciences (2020)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Testing a Citation and Text-Based Framework for Retrieving Publications for Literature Reviews (2018)Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study (2021)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?18 cited
  • 2015An experimental search strategy retrieves more precise results than PubMed and Google for questions about medical interventions13 cited
  • 2020Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study9 cited
  • 2018Publikationen aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum in Zeitschriften mit hohem Impact Factor: Entwicklung und Validierung eines Suchfilters8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work