HAZARD PROCESSES AND MARTINGALE HAZARD PROCESSES

Abstract

In this paper, we build a bridge between different reduced‐form approaches to pricing defaultable claims. In particular, we show how the well‐known formulas by Duffie, Schroder, and Skiadas and by Elliott, Jeanblanc, and Yor are related. Moreover, in the spirit of Collin Dufresne, Hugonnier, and Goldstein, we propose a simple pricing formula under an equivalent change of measure. Two processes will play a central role: the hazard process and the martingale hazard process attached to a default time. The crucial step is to understand the difference between them, which has been an open question in the literature so far. We show that pseudo‐stopping times appear as the most general class of random times for which these two processes are equal. We also show that these two processes always differ when τ is an honest time, providing an explicit expression for the difference. Eventually we provide a solution to another open problem: we show that if τ is an arbitrary random (default) time such that its Azéma's supermartingale is continuous, then τ avoids stopping times.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.