Tacit knowledge, heuristics, consistency and error signals

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to consider the methods used by publicly supported business advisers to assess their client businesses. These business advisers are increasingly required to diagnose the problem or opportunities that face their clients before recommending types of business support. Design/methodology/approach The study reports semi‐structured interviews with 39 business advisers, from accountants to publicly funded Business Link business advisers. Findings The study suggests that one of the key to understanding the way in which advisers assess businesses is through congruence, that is does the business reflect the aims and objectives of the management in its operations and processes. Failure to be congruent can deliver error messages to advisers that suggest a problem diagnosis. Practical implications Business advice is shown to be a process that involves judgemental decision making. In turn, this may enable advisers to focus on solutions to these identified problems. Originality/value This paper builds on a significant gap in the extant knowledge on the processes of making diagnosis of business problems in a holistic manner.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.