Measures of Interobserver Agreement and Reliability

Mohamed M. Shoukri

87 citations0/0 files storedCRC Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

Agreement among at least two evaluators is an issue of prime importance to statisticians, clinicians, epidemiologists, psychologists, and many other scientists. Measuring interobserver agreement is a method used to evaluate inconsistencies in findings from different evaluators who collect the same or similar information. Highlighting applications o

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014Fleiss’ kappa statistic without paradoxes 2020Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study 2014How to assess and compare inter-rater reliability, agreement and correlation of ratings: an exemplary analysis of mother-father and parent-teacher expressive vocabulary rating pairs 2007An Analysis of Accountability Policies in Finland and the United States 2014Choice of agreement indices for assessing and improving measurement reproducibility in a core laboratory setting 2020Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment 2004Analysis of Caries Experience Taking Inter-observer Bias and Variability into Account 2016How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.