SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial System: Introducing Lay Participation in T aiwan
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial System: Introducing Lay Participation in T aiwan (2013)Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial Syste…Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research (2013)Understanding World Jury Syst…Judge‐Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the K orean Jury System (2013)Judge‐Jury Agreement in Crimi…Japan's New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action? (2010)Japan's New Lay Judge System:…Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations (2009)Citizens, Courts, and Confirm…Jury Systems Around the World (2008)Jury Systems Around the WorldLay Assessors of German Administrative Courts: Fairness, Power‐Distance Orientation, and Deliberation Activity (2007)Lay Assessors of German Admin…Exploring lay participation in legal decision-making: Lessons from mixed tribunals (2007)Exploring lay participation i…Generational and age‐based differences in attitudes towards jury service* (2001)Generational and age‐based di…World Jury Systems (2000)World Jury SystemsPaths to Justice : What People Do and Think About Going to Law (1999)Paths to Justice : What Peopl…Verdict: assessing the civil jury system (1994)Verdict: assessing the civil …What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors (1993)What Jurors Think: Expectatio…Race and the Jury (1993)Race and the JuryAre Twelve Heads Better than One? (1989)Are Twelve Heads Better than …The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant (1978)The Myth of the Reluctant Lit…Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society (1964)Law in Japan: The Legal Order…Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)Against Deliberation (1997)Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. (2001)On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. (2006)Why Deliberative Democracy? (2004)Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice (2005)Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation (2005)Investigating Race Salience, Defendant Race, and Victim Race Effects on Mock Juror Decision-Making in Canada (2018)Politics in the Courtroom: Political Ideology and Jury Decision Making (2018)Jury Decision‐making in Rape Trials (2021)Dispute processes ADR and the primary forms of decision-making (2005)The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work (2006)Climbing the Dispute Pagoda: Grievances and Appeals to the Official Justice System in Rural China (2007)Deliberative Decision-Making on the Norwegian County Social Welfare Board: The Experiences of Expert and Lay Members (2016)Double Whammy: Lay Assessors as Lackeys in Chinese Courts (2016)Trial by Jury: Story of a Legal Transplant (2017)Judging jury service: Results of the north Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey* (2001)Preferences for Juries Over Judges Across Racial and Ethnic Groups* (2008)Technology and note-taking in the classroom, boardroom, hospital room, and courtroom (2016)On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public (2012)Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy (2014)Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology? (2014)Differential Treatment of Corporate Defendants by Juries: An Examination of the “Deep-Pockets” Hypothesis (1996)Explaining "pain and suffering" awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions. (1997)VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness (2005)The Japanese Mafia (2003)Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment” and the Development of Legal Consciousness (2006)The Unreluctant Litigant? An Empirical Analysis of Japan’s Turn to Litigation (2006)Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. (1995)Technologies of truth: cultural citizenship and the popular media (1998)White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. (2001)Case studies of pre- and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation. (2002)From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic Attitudes (2008)Effects of an alibi witness’s relationship to the defendant on mock jurors’ judgments. (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Paths to Justice : What People Do and Think About Going to Law363 cited
  • 2009Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations238 cited
  • 1978The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant159 cited
  • 1989Are Twelve Heads Better than One?129 cited
  • 1994Verdict: assessing the civil jury system109 cited
  • 2008Jury Systems Around the World84 cited
  • 1993Race and the Jury69 cited
  • 2000World Jury Systems68 cited
  • 2007Exploring lay participation in legal decision-making: Lessons from mixed tribunals41 cited
  • 1993What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors31 cited
  • 1964Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society25 cited
  • 2001Generational and age‐based differences in attitudes towards jury service*23 cited
  • 2013Judge‐Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the K orean Jury System22 cited
  • 2013Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research21 cited
  • 2007Lay Assessors of German Administrative Courts: Fairness, Power‐Distance Orientation, and Deliberation Activity19 cited
  • 2010Japan's New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.